PDA

View Full Version : Who is more qualified to talk about football strategy?

sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 10:24 AM
This came up in another thread where Vito claims that since he served in the military (I had to bring it up because god knows he will say it ten times) he has more credibility to talk about big picture military issues then anyone who hasn't served.

Of course, the notion that your average grunt in the field has a better understanding of Big picture US military strategy then a guy working in the pentagon who never served is ridiculous, (heck, the guy in the oval office never served) but I think the above analogy drives it home.
JoeJGibbs
12-07-2009, 10:32 AM
Doesn't this automatically assume the argument that Vito is an idiot that served in the military

ie the 'HeHateMe' of the Military?
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 10:34 AM
Doesn't this automatically assume the argument that Vito is an idiot that served in the military

ie the 'HeHateMe' of the Military?

No, it only assumes what he has said, which is that EVERYONE who served is more qualified to speak on military issues then ANYONE who has not served.

I use extreme examples as they are included in his blanket statement.
JoeJGibbs
12-07-2009, 10:35 AM
Did he say that he has more credibility than ANYONE?

or

More credibility than ANYONE at VG that hasn't served.
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 10:43 AM
Did he say that he has more credibility than ANYONE?

or

More credibility than ANYONE at VG that hasn't served.

Not him vs. VG, he said ANYONE in the military vs. ANYONE not in the military. Then he posted a 12 line quote from Colonel Jessup in a few good men (I'm not joking) and thought that made him right.:p

I actually like this line of thought, as it means Barack Obama has no credibility when it comes to military strategy.(I'm sure Vito didn't really think this through)
JoeJGibbs
12-07-2009, 10:45 AM
haha he probably just meant civilians like you or I or Stinkems241 on this message board.
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 12:09 PM
lol @ the guy who voted for he hate me. I should have known that with all the haters, Bellichek was a bad example.
Gtrght77
12-07-2009, 01:53 PM
Wow


Three threads to attempt to make this point? :p
levdgg
12-07-2009, 02:09 PM
Wow


Three threads to attempt to make this point? :p

Which thread is gayer? We should make a poll about that.
Nevada_Ballin
12-07-2009, 02:28 PM
It can't be said that he "never" played football.

Belichick attended Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut where he played center/tight end.

After graduating, he took a $25-per-week job as an assistant to Baltimore Colts head coach Ted Marchibroda in 1975. In 1976, Belichick joined the Detroit Lions as their assistant special teams coach before adding tight ends and wide receivers to his coaching duties in 1977. He spent the 1978 season with the Denver Broncos as their assistant special teams coach and defensive assistant.

.
Nevada_Ballin
12-07-2009, 02:38 PM
It can be said that BB's experience in football far outweighs that of Rod Smart.


.
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 02:39 PM
It can be said that BB's experience in football far outweighs that of Rod Smart.


.

Not according to the people in the poll.....lol

The ignorance of people on this forum is astounding sometimes.
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 03:16 PM
Did he say that he has more credibility than ANYONE?

or

More credibility than ANYONE at VG that hasn't served.

Don't fall for his "Tom-foolery" Mr. Gibbs. He's taking me WAAAAAY out of context, and I have the quotes to prove it.

They were debating over whether or not phrases like "The Global War on Terror" would inspire the troops more than the slogan they're using these days. (I've gotta be honest, I don't know what the hell they're calling it these days), but of course this just proves the point that I was trying to make...WE DON'T CARE ABOUT SLOGANS.

I persisted further to ask if anyone on the thread had ACTUALLY served.

Then this a** clown tries to tell me "well, I didn't serve, but my brothers have. So that gives me MORE insight than you because I have MORE of a vested interest."

Then he and his little cronies tried to insinuate that I and the other VETERANS probably joined "just for the free stuff".

So I had to get him.

YES...I used the quote from Col. Nathan Jessup from "A Few Good Men", because this guy and his cohorts clearly don't know what it means to serve THEMSELVES. I don't care if it was your twin brother who served...IT WASN'T YOU. So for you to say, "I know for a fact that more troops disagree with you" is a bit of a stretch don't ya think?

And yes, he (or should I say SHE) is quite the homosexual for attempting to make this little "analogy" for what...the third time now.

Side...you're kinda sad.

That enough info for you Mr. Gibbs?
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 03:20 PM
This thread is nothing more than an attempt to gather quotes to support you ridiculous claim.

Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaah hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

You know how I know you're gay Side....?
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 03:43 PM
You know how I know you're gay Side....?



Then this a** clown tries to tell me "well, I didn't serve, but my brothers have. So that gives me MORE insight than you because I have MORE of a vested interest."




And yes, he (or should I say SHE) is quite the homosexual for attempting to make this little "analogy" for what...the third time now.



Is homosexual bigotry accepted on this site now?

I mean I don't mind the personal insults, I get them from people on a day to day basis, but I do note that this guy has now made bigoted comments across 3 separate threads relating to homosexuals.

I don't see any difference between gay-bashing and any other type of bigotry, and it certainly wouldn't be tolerated against any other group.
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 03:45 PM
Is homosexual bigotry accepted on this site now?

I mean I don't mind the personal insults, I get them from people on a day to day basis, but I do note that this guy has now made bigoted comments across 3 separate threads relating to homosexuals.

I don't see any difference between gay-bashing and any other type of bigotry, and it certainly wouldn't be tolerated against any other group.

Ok, Side. I'm sorry.

Wanna hug it out?
Gtrght77
12-07-2009, 03:56 PM
Not according to the people in the poll.....lol

The ignorance of people on this forum is astounding sometimes.

I think they are just responding to a stupid question with a stupid answer.
sideoutshu
12-07-2009, 03:59 PM
I think they are just responding to a stupid question with a stupid answer.

Why is the question stupid? Does it not prove the point that you don't need experience in a field in order to fairly comment on said field?
mightypharaoh
12-07-2009, 05:25 PM
This thread is nothing more than an attempt to gather quotes to support you ridiculous claim.

Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaah hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

You know how I know you're gay Side....?

Is homosexual bigotry accepted on this site now?

I mean I don't mind the personal insults, I get them from people on a day to day basis, but I do note that this guy has now made bigoted comments across 3 separate threads relating to homosexuals.

I don't see any difference between gay-bashing and any other type of bigotry, and it certainly wouldn't be tolerated against any other group.

NOTED - Vito please chill with the gay remarks. thanks
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 05:29 PM
HEY NOW...I apologized. Didn't you see it?
R-ILLA
12-07-2009, 05:40 PM
It is kind of Homo sexualishness
Gtrght77
12-07-2009, 05:41 PM
It is kind of Homo sexualishness


It's not bigotry calling someone or something gay that is gay. :p
Nevada_Ballin
12-07-2009, 05:44 PM
Is homosexual bigotry accepted on this site now?

I mean I don't mind the personal insults, I get them from people on a day to day basis, but I do note that this guy has now made bigoted comments across 3 separate threads relating to homosexuals.

I don't see any difference between gay-bashing and any other type of bigotry, and it certainly wouldn't be tolerated against any other group.

Agree........ Vito please tone it down

Thanks


.
R-ILLA
12-07-2009, 05:48 PM
It's not bigotry calling someone or something gay that is gay. :p

I guess he should have stated that he was acting like a e-broad.
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 05:50 PM
Agree........ Vito please tone it down

Thanks


.

Ok now, I don't mind admitting that I perhaps crossed the line. But can a man get some acknowledgment that he apologized ACROSS THESE THREE THREADS?

I'm just sayin...
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 05:59 PM
I invite you all to read the "Obamas Troop Surge Is Bush 2.0" thread to understand the origin of this foolishness. You be the judge.
bfox
12-07-2009, 08:09 PM
Belichick did play football before, just not at the nfl level.

The point still stands though, he played and knows strategy.
YoungVito
12-07-2009, 10:44 PM
Belichick did play football before, just not at the nfl level.

The point still stands though, he played and knows strategy.

She'll/he'll never acknowledge what you just said. She'll/he'll just stand by the only two/three who agree with her/him and ride that out.

Just you watch.
Nevada_Ballin
12-07-2009, 11:25 PM
Ok now, I don't mind admitting that I perhaps crossed the line. But can a man get some acknowledgment that he apologized ACROSS THESE THREE THREADS?

I'm just sayin...

Thank you!

:)


.
RicoVacilon
12-08-2009, 07:07 AM
Why is the question stupid? Does it not prove the point that you don't need experience in a field in order to fairly comment on said field?

So you're saying Bill Bellichick doesn't have experience in the field of football? lol
RicoVacilon
12-08-2009, 07:08 AM
Ok now, I don't mind admitting that I perhaps crossed the line. But can a man get some acknowledgment that he apologized ACROSS THESE THREE THREADS?

I'm just sayin...

I hereby acknowledge you apologized to Side at the top of page 2.
YoungVito
12-08-2009, 09:15 AM
I hereby acknowledge you apologized to Side at the top of page 2.

Good lookin out Rico.
sanantonio
12-08-2009, 09:32 AM
Good lookin out Rico.

I would have but I just figured you meant Sides and I was hoping you weren't holding your breath lol.
YoungVito
12-08-2009, 10:02 AM
Although I did hear this one term that was van-gloriously funny.

"E-Broad". LOL
R-ILLA
12-08-2009, 11:28 AM
Although I did hear this one term that was van-gloriously funny.

"E-Broad". LOL

Yeah I copyright, trademark, or whatever that term. People like to toss around E-Thug/Gangsta etc. when it suit them. So I'll start shooting out E-broad/Dweeb etc..... I dont even use the word dweeb but it sounds/looks good after "E-"
JoeJGibbs
12-08-2009, 12:52 PM
Yeah I copyright, trademark, or whatever that term. People like to toss around E-Thug/Gangsta etc. when it suit them. So I'll start shooting out E-broad/Dweeb etc..... I dont even use the word dweeb but it sounds/looks good after "E-"

Sorry mane. I already patented everything E when I brought it to VG.
R-ILLA
12-08-2009, 01:24 PM
Sorry mane. I already patented everything E when I brought it to VG.

Impossible.
YoungVito
12-08-2009, 01:42 PM
Well, whoever brought it up...IT FUNNY. And I'm gonna have to start "calling spades, spades" when they do s*** like this fool and these threads. I'll let you folks tell it.

What you think?