PDA

View Full Version : **** PML Season #4 : Off Season Requirement ****



vincent240
01-31-2010, 12:47 PM
Gentlemen:

DSF and I have decided on a course for the offseason to promote a little more activities. Let's agree on one point: while ideas and methods are good, it all comes down to league owners being active - no ideas or methods can substitute for your league participation. Period.

Our idea is not the best either; it does have some flaws as well. However, it is easy to implement, and it serves our purpose without forcing members to create gapping holes on their teams while simulating NFL's salary cap casualties to a small degree. Here's what we are proposing:

Every season playoff teams loose players due to demands for higher salary, salary cap, free agency, hence we are asking all playoff teams to drop one 80 overall player who is 32 year old or younger. All non-playoff teams will have to drop one 70 overall player who is 32 year old or younger. These players will be used in one round supplemental draft via the rookie draft order.

This meets our objectives in these ways:

1) You have more choices who you want to drop. There are more 80's and 70's players.
2) The 80's or 70's players who are 32 or younger can still be serviceable to other teams.
3) This creates a very small hole on each team causing owners to pursue ways to fill that gap hence a little more activities.
4) This gives teams that didn't make the playoff a better chance to improve a little, if not a lot.
5) Simulate NFL's Salary Cap casualties to a small degree.
6) Small amount of work for us and you. We will have only one round of supplement draft. We can finish in one day.
7) Helps guys who came in after the fantasy draft to fill their holes left by previous owners.

*As NB suggested, we should drop this required player among the seven, but I am hoping to hear from the rest of the league before we proceed with this idea and/or any changes needed. So hang in there. We will decide at the end of today then you can drop.

Again, doing nothing is not an option. Regardless of any method we chose, your league involvement is crucial to a healthy league.



Respectfully,

Vincent.

Nevada_Ballin
01-31-2010, 12:54 PM
I don't think i have a player that's over 70

:)


.

alaw78
01-31-2010, 12:58 PM
Gentlemen:

DSF and I have decided on a course for the offseason to promote a little more activities. Let's agree on one point: while ideas and methods are good, it all comes down to league owners being active - no ideas or methods can substitute for your league participation. Period.

Our idea is not the best either; it does have some flaws as well. However, it is easy to implement, and it serves our purpose without forcing members to create gapping holes on their teams while simulating NFL's salary cap casualties to a small degree. Here's what we are proposing:

Every season playoff teams loose players due to demands for higher salary, salary cap, free agency, hence we are asking all playoff teams to drop one 80 overall player who is 32 year old or younger. All non-playoff teams will have to drop one 70 overall player who is 32 year old or younger. These players will be used in one round supplemental draft via the rookie draft order.

This meets our objectives in these ways:

1) You have more choices who you want to drop. There are more 80's and 70's players.
2) The 80's or 70's players who are 32 or younger can still be serviceable to other teams.
3) This creates a very small hole on each team causing owners to pursue ways to fill that gap hence a little more activities.
4) This gives teams that didn't make the playoff a better chance to improve a little, if not a lot.
5) Simulate NFL's Salary Cap casualties to a small degree.
6) Small amount of work for us and you. We will have only one round of supplement draft. We can finish in one day.
7) Helps guys who came in after the fantasy draft to fill their holes left by previous owners.

*As NB suggested, we should drop this required player among the seven, but I am hoping to hear from the rest of the league before we proceed with this idea and/or any changes needed. So hang in there. We will decide at the end of today then you can drop.

Again, doing nothing is not an option. Regardless of any method we chose, your league involvement is crucial to a healthy league.


Respectfully,

Vincent.

GREAT IDEA are we going to do this I will drop a player soon if so.

Neg_Maron
01-31-2010, 12:59 PM
I can live with this. 1 is better than 15

Ultimatum-A
01-31-2010, 01:09 PM
I can live with this. 1 is better than 15

great idea! Makes me proud to be a member of VG! :p Even though I'm not a member of PML. lol

Nevada_Ballin
01-31-2010, 01:13 PM
Now, all of us have to drop 7 players anyway (if we don't want the CPU to drop them for us after the draft... the CPU WILL do this if you don't).

So I'm assuming the required player can be in this group of 7..... ?


.

Ultimatum-A
01-31-2010, 01:15 PM
Now, all of us have to drop 7 players anyway (if we don't want the CPU to drop them for us after the draft... the CPU WILL do this if you don't).

So I'm assuming the required player can be in this group of 7..... ?


.

LOL!!!1 NOPE, you gotta drop another guy after the draft! LMAO!!!

xX SNAKE Xx
01-31-2010, 01:16 PM
I already droped some that were picked up in f/a, now what...

vincent240
01-31-2010, 01:17 PM
Now, all of us have to drop 7 players anyway (if we don't want the CPU to drop them for us after the draft... the CPU WILL do this if you don't).

So I'm assuming the required player can be in this group of 7..... ?


.

Good point, NB. I agree with you to drop this required player among the seven. However, I was hoping to hear the rest of the league members before we go ahead with this idea and/or any changes are needed.

vincent240
01-31-2010, 01:34 PM
I already droped some that were picked up in f/a, now what...

Snake, you only have to drop one more player. The other six stays in FA. If you have to pick back up one FA then go ahead. Noone should be picking FA after our announcemnt here -> http://www.maddentips.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138390

huntin1
01-31-2010, 02:40 PM
I like this idea.

Gtrght77
01-31-2010, 03:53 PM
I already dropped all the players I am going to or actually can.

drunkenstarfish
01-31-2010, 05:05 PM
This will be after the draft. The whole idea is to try to simulate our teams losing players to free agency like real NFL teams do each season. If we do nothing people will sit on their teams and do nothing. Not exactly franchise type of game play.

Gtrght77
01-31-2010, 05:21 PM
This will be after the draft. The whole idea is to try to simulate our teams losing players to free agency like real NFL teams do each season. If we do nothing people will sit on their teams and do nothing. Not exactly franchise type of game play.

Progressing rookies to season 3 is franchise type play, once your team is built why would you trade anymore? I am just saying, my team is about to Beast out and I would like to reap the rewards of that next season.

drunkenstarfish
01-31-2010, 05:24 PM
Progressing rookies to season 3 is franchise type play, once your team is built why would you trade anymore?

So no teams in the NFL lose players to FA? Every season there are teams that lose players to free agency. Plus teams lose players due to salary cap. We have none of these things. It is one player. Not 15. You have to release one player ranked in the 70's. No big deal.

X Bones X
01-31-2010, 06:14 PM
So no teams in the NFL lose players to FA? Every season there are teams that lose players to free agency. Plus teams lose players due to salary cap. We have none of these things. It is one player. Not 15. You have to release one player ranked in the 70's. No big deal.

bingo


unrealistic to have a BEAST OUT team for more then 1 year.

R-ILLA
01-31-2010, 07:43 PM
Will this draft be after the rookie draft?

vincent240
01-31-2010, 07:44 PM
Will this draft be after the rookie draft?

Yes, it will be.