What NCAA Team Would Reggie Bush?

[2Real4U]

If you could pick one other NCAA team for Reggie To Go on out of these ten then What would your pick be

[Apok]

Texas, duh.

[Chain Crew86]

Bring him to morgantown to play for my EER'S!
Texas could really benifit having bush in the backfield.But i'm happy where he is at now.He is a big part of why that team is one of the best in history.
3-PEAT!

[djwill13]

i'm not even sure i understand the point behind this post. he plays for usc, every coach in amercia would want him on their team, but usc got him (isn't that the whole point of recruiting?).

[Kaidog]

If you could pick a new mascot for UGA....what would it be?!?!? :confused:

[djwill13]

If you could pick a new mascot for UGA....what would it be?!?!? :confused:
uh...............uga??? :confused: :D no wait, hairy lol. no, even better, the stanford tree :D :rolleyes:

[RyanZ923]

uh...............uga??? :confused: :D no wait, hairy lol. no, even better, the stanford tree :D :rolleyes:
dude cardinal not tree get it right geez lol

edit: u know its a tree because they had a contest for the students to design a new mascot and the tree was the cleanest one they received

[Born Ona Mtn]

If you could pick a new mascot for UGA....what would it be?!?!? :confused:


Blue from blues clues! Or maybe "Fritz the gay biker"

[ondaperimeter]

If you could pick one other NCAA team for Reggie To Go on out of these ten then What would your pick be
FSU!

Put him in with Lo Booker and Le-Dub, Put X-Lee under center, and run "Wishbone Wide" with Carr and Davis split wide. That would get the "O" moving! :D


If you could pick a new mascot for UGA....what would it be?!?!? :confused:


What about one of those American Kennel Club championship Poodles? :p

[heavy_hitter]

Or maybe "Fritz the gay biker"

You mean Mizzou Freaks boyfriend Jeff Stryker.

[heavy_hitter]

i'm not even sure i understand the point behind this post. he plays for usc, every coach in amercia would want him on their team, but usc got him (isn't that the whole point of recruiting?).


I agree and am glad I am not the first person that said something.

BTW, DJ..... Imagine if all white people were black and all black people were white. What do you think?

[djwill13]

I agree and am glad I am not the first person that said something.

BTW, DJ..... Imagine if all white people were black and all black people were white. What do you think?
what about the asians? where's nole at? lol :D

[M-Dub?]

What if, like, C-A-T really spelled "dog"?

[Born Ona Mtn]

What if you revearsed M-dub?

BUD- MMMmmmmmm :eek:

[djwill13]

What if, like, C-A-T really spelled "dog"?
somebody's been watching revenge of the nerds..........

"that's deep ogor..........deep" lol :D

[M-Dub?]

What if you revearsed M-dub?

BUD- MMMmmmmmm :eek:

mmmmmmmmmm

[djwill13]

mmmmmmmmmm
i think he meant the other bud dub, as in light lol

[Born Ona Mtn]

Naw, i meant can of bus!

[heavy_hitter]

Hey... if I were a woman, would that make me gay? I love the puntang.

[UKwannabe]

I think the questions means which team would benefit MOST by having reggie on thier team.

And its gotta be OSU. They got the option QB, the wideouts, TE's, Defense...All they need is a stellar HB. OSU would be beastly with bush

[mobettaut]

i'm not even sure i understand the point behind this post. he plays for usc, every coach in amercia would want him on their team, but usc got him (isn't that the whole point of recruiting?).

i thought it made sense from the poll question that he meant in the game who would be best with #5 (as mentioned above), not in real life...although I could be wrong. so theoretically, you could edit the rosters to try out your choice :p
So with Young and that Texas line he would be killer in that option offense...also the same with OSU, put in Troy Smith, and with Ginn and Holmes and they are stellar at the skilled positions.

[M-Dub?]

i thought it made sense from the poll question that he meant in the game who would be best with #5 (as mentioned above), not in real life...although I could be wrong. so theoretically, you could edit the rosters to try out your choice :p
So with Young and that Texas line he would be killer in that option offense...also the same with OSU, put in Troy Smith, and with Ginn and Holmes and they are stellar at the skilled positions.

It's not that we didn't understand the question. It's just kind of a silly premise to begin with. I mean, what team wouldn't benefit from having Reggie? Even Oklahoma, who already have the best HB on the game, could use him. Put Peterson at 2nd string and then use the twin HB formation sub. That would be one sick backfield. You could easily pile up 400+ on the ground.

[mobettaut]

It's not that we didn't understand the question. It's just kind of a silly premise to begin with. I mean, what team wouldn't benefit from having Reggie? Even Oklahoma, who already have the best HB on the game, could use him. Put Peterson at 2nd string and then use the twin HB formation sub. That would be one sick backfield. You could easily pile up 400+ on the ground.

By my understanding, the point of the question is missed...its not who "would" want him or benefit...its who "best" would benefit, meaning you would take into consideration the team's offense, such as the O-Line, QB and threats at WR. Yea every team would be better with him, but some teams would benefit more from him than others. For instance, I think he would be utilized better with UT or OSU, than say with Michigan State because of their personnel. Or even with OU b/c of the reasons you mentioned. I think the reasons of why you would put #5 on the team you pick is what the thread aimed for, hence, you answered it :)

[djwill13]

By my understanding, the point of the question is missed...its not who "would" want him or benefit...its who "best" would benefit, meaning you would take into consideration the team's offense, such as the O-Line, QB and threats at WR. Yea every team would be better with him, but some teams would benefit more from him than others. For instance, I think he would be utilized better with UT or OSU, than say with Michigan State because of their personnel. Or even with OU b/c of the reasons you mentioned. I think the reasons of why you would put #5 on the team you pick is what the thread aimed for, hence, you answered it :)
my point is, it's pointless to argue or even dispute this. like i said, what coach (team) woudln't want him? if you condone this thread, then who's to say we don't have a "what team would better benifit having vince young, ted ginn, dj shockley, devin hester, adrian peterson, brady quinn, jeff smardjha, brad smith, omar jacobs, deangelo williams, tyrell sutton, laurence marooney, derek hagan, mercedes lewis, leonard pope, marshawn lynch, or calvin johnson". i guess the point i'm trying to make is, he plays for USC, that's the beauty of college football.............recruiting.

[mobettaut]

my point is, it's pointless to argue or even dispute this. like i said, what coach (team) woudln't want him? if you condone this thread, then who's to say we don't have a "what team would better benifit having vince young, ted ginn, dj shockley, devin hester, adrian peterson, brady quinn, jeff smardjha, brad smith, omar jacobs, deangelo williams, tyrell sutton, laurence marooney, derek hagan, mercedes lewis, leonard pope, marshawn lynch, or calvin johnson". i guess the point i'm trying to make is, he plays for USC, that's the beauty of college football.............recruiting.

of course you could make those threads too, but ppl mainly be interested in a couple like Young or Bush...also, its not really to argue or dispute tho...its just hypothetical, for fun i'm sure, just to see who you pick and the reasons...like seeing AP and Bush both in the backfield, or Young and Bush running option...thats all...and we are talking about the video game so recruiting doesn't apply since you could just edit the rosters to put bush on your team...
now if this thread was talking about real life only...then I totally agree with ya'll, it would be pointless, yet it would still have its creative purpose...i would compare it to how ESPN is doing that USC vs Greatest Past Teams thing...can't really happen, but just interesting to hear peoples' opinions and reasoning.
Don't wanna keep the thread off-topic anymore though, but to each their own though, so i respect your thoughts :)

[UKwannabe]

I interpreted the questions as saying "which team would benifit MOST by having bush." Not texas, Tex already has good RB's. Not OU,, they have AP, not FSU, theyre loaded at RB. Anyway, its gotta be OSU. Bush would make OSU unstoppable(on the game)

[CrazyOldGuy]

If the question which team would benefit the most, the answer is obvious...

TEMPLE!

By the way which came first the chicken or the egg? :rolleyes:

I say EGG (dinosaurs) but would love your opinion? Should I make a poll?