PDA

View Full Version : Tampa PB Versus Oakland PB



eyeknife
01-11-2006, 09:43 AM
These 2 play books are very similar.Any reason one would be better than the other ? I know Oakland has a lone shotgun formation, and the splitback flex.
Tampa has more bunch formations out of the singleback. I think so anyway.
So including formation shifts, what are the pros and cons. Thanks.

getyogameup06
01-11-2006, 09:58 AM
These 2 play books are very similar.Any reason one would be better than the other ? I know Oakland has a lone shotgun formation, and the splitback flex.
Tampa has more bunch formations out of the singleback. I think so anyway.
So including formation shifts, what are the pros and cons. Thanks.

THESE ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT PLAYBOOKS WHILE I LIKE TAMP BAYS PLAYBOOK IT IS NOTHING IN COMPARISON TO OAK BUT THERE IS ONE FORMATION IS TAMPABAYS BOOK THAT IS UNIQUE TO ALL PLAYBOOKS. IT HAS 3WR BUNCHED ON ONE SIDE OF THE FIELD N TE TO THE LEFT. ALOT OF TIMES U CAN CREATE MISMATCHES WITH A LB TRYING TO GUARD A RECIEVER OR CB TRYING TO COVER TE. IT TAKES ALOT OF TIME TO LEARN HOW TO PROPERLY GUARD THAT FORMATION.

Tadow904
01-11-2006, 10:00 AM
These 2 play books are very similar.Any reason one would be better than the other ? I know Oakland has a lone shotgun formation, and the splitback flex.
Tampa has more bunch formations out of the singleback. I think so anyway.
So including formation shifts, what are the pros and cons. Thanks.

it all depends on what u like to do between the two tampa favors SB sets oak favors the 2 back set. both are good books

Kobra
01-11-2006, 10:02 AM
These 2 play books are very similar.Any reason one would be better than the other ? I know Oakland has a lone shotgun formation, and the splitback flex.
Tampa has more bunch formations out of the singleback. I think so anyway.
So including formation shifts, what are the pros and cons. Thanks.

Raiders have more Weak I Formations which is why I like the the book so much.

Kobra