PDA

View Full Version : 4-3 Blitz Scheme



evad04
10-13-2006, 01:19 PM
This scheme is incredibly simple. We bring the heat with 4 or 5 guys in this little scheme. We are only looking for two things in a play:
1.) The blitz angle of the OLB(s)
2.) The level of coverage

So, 4-3 users, go into your playbooks. Two helpful plays will be "Mid Rush" and "Hog Buck 3".

Both are Cover 3 zone blitzes. Using or pre-snap playmaker, we can make tons of adjustments.

Here is what you do:

1.) Make sure you have your best speed on one side of the defense; example for Packers: put AJ Hawk and KGB on same side as a DE and OLB tandem

2.) Come out in a play where the blitz angle of the LOLB (right side of screen) is similar or the same as "Mid Rush" and "Hog Buck 3".

3.) Take the DE on the side of the blitzing LOLB and lift him off the line about 2 yards. Switch to your LOLB. The DE will go back to his spot, but line-up about 1/2 yard further back. Take the LOLB and place him where the DE originally was (which will be directly in front of the DE).

4.) Adjust coverage. One thing I like to do is man up my CBs, bump them on the WRs, then lift them about 3 yards back (creates a delayed BNR effect). Then I make sure the flats (usually a blitz outlet) are covered. Then I roam with the safety.

Results:
At the snap, the LOLB or DE will slam in to the OT and many times one of them will shoot free. The reason we move them where we do is that this technique gets them downfield faster.

Tips:
Against the run you just want to adjust the rest of your defense accordingly. I usually move my MLB over the bubble on the rightside A-gap, and just a little to the right. I then slide my ROLB over the weakside A-gap about 3 yards off the line. Finally I move the FS closer to the line, then I control him or the FS.

sanantonio
10-13-2006, 01:49 PM
Nice Dave I will try this later after work. I got some new stuff I'm working on that I will post here later.

evad04
10-13-2006, 01:54 PM
Thanks Sanantonio... should I call you sanantonio?

The more the merrier.

blueblood
10-13-2006, 02:12 PM
I'm going to try this tonight. It sounds good on paper lol. In one of my franchises I use 3-4 and the other I use 4-3 so I had to master and learn them both so this should give me another tool to add in my box.

sanantonio
10-13-2006, 02:29 PM
Thanks Sanantonio... should I call you sanantonio?

The more the merrier.

sanantonio or Greg either or it doesn't matter. That is some good ish though. :D

ManningMVP
10-13-2006, 07:45 PM
A tight end staying in to block plus a running back will stop that.Plus IMO it seems like a lot B4 the snap.

sanantonio
10-13-2006, 09:14 PM
A tight end staying in to block plus a running back will stop that.Plus IMO it seems like a lot B4 the snap.

That would still be to your advantage that's 2 less people running routes. With only 3 people running routes and still the possibility of the blitz getting through it's still the D's advantage.

You wouldn't want to run this every down anyway. Give em the same look but change it up from engage 8 to cover 3.

evad04
10-13-2006, 11:14 PM
Its all about the blitz angle... if you can find a man defense play with it then us delayed BNR and patrol with safety. Unless they are scrambling QB you can usually put DE on opposite side of field in some type of zone (flat, buzz, hook). If you ARE playing a scrambling QB then put the DE on the opposite side to contain.

And most people use their TEs. And if they are blocking, then flip the play. Make them adjust to you.

Remember, at the most this is a 5 man blitz. At the least it is 4 guys coming. Seems pretty good to me.

35BigHurt35
10-23-2006, 02:34 PM
um......that is cheesy. plain and simple.

evad04
10-23-2006, 03:23 PM
um......that is cheesy. plain and simple.
Yeah well so are random blitz angles. Lets tell the truth, BigHurt, defense is A LOT tougher this year. Anyone who says differently ISN'T playing anyone good.

And all this does is create confusion for the O-line... who already seem to hold the trump card with random gap blitzing and slide protection.

Still cheesy?