Whats With the New Rosters???

[Mikey]

they did not update the rosters very good my biggest disapoint ment is tony romo come on 82 Overall and they have bledso as 85 overall whats up with that. well anyways just post what you think about the new rosters.

[Gregster221]

i agree completely. they do need to update the rosters A LOT. yeah romo should be way up and so should philip rivers, theyre both playing great now.

[monsterBEN]

i disagree with Romo being much higher.. EA cant make snap decisions based on 4-5 weeks. Otherwise, guys like Shaun Alexander, Randy Moss, Tiki Barber, Ben Roethlisberger would be mid-80's right now

they should swap ratings when QB's are benched/promoted. Make Romo an 85 and Bledsoe an 82

[meth001]

i disagree with Romo being much higher.. EA cant make snap decisions based on 4-5 weeks. Otherwise, guys like Shaun Alexander, Randy Moss, Tiki Barber, Ben Roethlisberger would be mid-80's right now

they should swap ratings when QB's are benched/promoted. Make Romo an 85 and Bledsoe an 82

Come on man, let Romo prove himself over a little more time. Lets not make him MVP just yet.

[Gregster221]

ok ill give you romo, but philip rivers, how about him! hes on fire! LT to, congrats on breaking alexanders TD record yesterday!

[Muddy Cleats]

Your all thinking too short term for ratings. Bledsoe's 85 takes into account his status as an excellent qb for 14 seasons in nfl. Romos 5 games no matter how good won't get him better ratings.

It's apparrent that ratings look at long term performance and therefore tend to not change that much for recent game play. if it did then Mike Karney would instantly become the greatest FB of all time based on one game.

[Mikey]

ok this is his week 7 in nfl and he makes the pro bowl come on hes better then 82 overall

[mpicz]

Well ya he should but not that much better, and throw the pro bowl thing out of there he should not have made that. Michael vick or even brett favre should be in his place. But ya his ratings should be higher.

[35BigHurt35]

Romo was severely exposed against the Saints. they kept him in the pocket, he didn't throw the ball "on time". he's only effective if you let him move around and buy time. the book is out on him and he'll be an 'average joe" before you know it. In the game against the saints, he should have had 4-5 int's easily......the rating are correct in my opinion...... by the way, they did boost Philip Rivers to a respectable 86 this time around...that's about right too....

[bigface]

V. Young should have got an AWR boost and 90 spd IMO.

Romo I agree should be atleast 85 for a pro bowler and Bledsoe lower than that. If he is only an 82 and a pro bowler then other ratings need to come down. Rivers should get more THP, 86 or 87 is unrealistic for a starter.

[Packersrule1]

Harris and Woodson need way more spd, how do they only have 89 and 87spd.

[COD12345]

How about Frank Gore??? Gore is a savage and he's only a 86. He should be about 91 speed, 94 break tackle, 92 agi, 95 acc, 80 catch, and 79 car. Second year, and he's starting in the pro bowl. Gore should be at least a 92 overall.