LOL... Further from the truth. People want the man coverage fixed because it is garbage. It is programmed for the AI to cheat because the game is programmed so poorly. It takes in NO consideration of player ratings. Heck, it isn't even football.
Originally Posted by Nevada_Ballin
We want the defense to be realistic. If a WR plays against a DB from Florida it will be much different than that WR going against a DB from North Texas. You dig? But, the game doesn't show that all because player ratings do or mean very very little in this game. Instead, we get this generic piss poor programmed defense from EVERY TEAM.
I don't want to stick to 3 or 4 plays that beat man. I want to be able to mix and match my playbook. If player rating meant anything then I would be able to open my playbook because then I am not playing against a cheating AI that knows my play. At that point I am concerned with player ratings and not AI. I then have to choose if I am going to throw against Bama's #1 DB or check down to a third or fourth option. The CPU AI does not give you this. You just have to know if in man throw here and if in zone throw here. IT IS BORING THAT WAY.
NCAA 08 was a turd.
NCAA 09 was a polished turd.
NCAA 10 is a steaming pile of crap.
NCAA 11... You can put a dress on a Pig but in the end she is still a Pig.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.