Those Nasty Wiki-Leaks!

[sanantonio]

There will be some astonishing revelations from these. I hear a few people talking about hanging others out to dry and this may be true, I don't know. What I do know is that there are a few people that won't be able to cover thier azzes anymore at least it looks that way. Two that come to mind are GWB and Obama.

This is a good read-
http://www.therealnews.com/t2/compon...attack-on-iran

The state department knew of the leak several months ago and had ample time to alert staff in sensitive locations. Its pre emptive scaremongering over the weekend stupidly contrived to hint at material not in fact being published. Nor is the material classified top secret being at a level that more than 3 million US government employees are cleared to see and available on the defence departments internal Siprnet. Such dissemination of secrets might be thought reckless suggesting a diplomatic outreach that makes the British empire seem minuscule.

[SUPDOG]

There will be some astonishing revelations from these. I hear a few people talking about hanging others out to dry and this may be true, I don't know. What I do know is that there are a few people that won't be able to cover thier azzes anymore at least it looks that way. Two that come to mind are GWB and Obama.

This is a good read-
http://www.therealnews.com/t2/compon...attack-on-iran

Yeah, Bush and Obama may have their backsides exposed. Thankfully, for Bama, he has the MSM, you and Nevada to do all that covering for him.

[conviction]

this writer mentions a 2007 report, does it say that they aren't producing nuclear weapons like in the 2003 report?

the writer later lateralizes the 2007 reports to the reports obama just recieved... what are these conclusions?

and i guess you're speaking figuratively, sanan, that obama needs to cover his ***; not so much with his past actions being revealed in the article but future actions and potential leaks?

[sanantonio]

this writer mentions a 2007 report, does it say that they aren't producing nuclear weapons like in the 2003 report?

the writer later lateralizes the 2007 reports to the reports obama just recieved... what are these conclusions?

and i guess you're speaking figuratively, sanan, that obama needs to cover his ***; not so much with his past actions being revealed in the article but future actions and potential leaks?

In so far as Obama is concerned I meant as to why we are still in Afghanistan. They are corrupt and we are spending an astronomical amount of money per week to stay there and the question is why? How does Obama justify remaining there?

[killacs]

I can't wait for Wikileaks to leak that bank stuff they're going to.

[sideoutshu]

Wiki leaks should be shut down and their owner tried for espionage. These douchebags are endangering people's lives for personal gain.

That being said, this isn't all bad for America. The leaked documents basically show that we are one of the only countries that actually says what it means. Countries like China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, etc are caught talking out of both sides of their mouths.

[killacs]

Wiki leaks should be shut down and their owner tried for espionage. These douchebags are endangering people's lives for personal gain.

That being said, this isn't all bad for America. The leaked documents basically show that we are one of the only countries that actually says what it means. Countries like China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, etc are caught talking out of both sides of their mouths.

I don't really see how they're further endangering lives of others. If you charge Wikileaks with espionage you have to charge whoever leaked the info to them as well.

[sideoutshu]

I don't really see how they're further endangering lives of others. If you charge Wikileaks with espionage you have to charge whoever leaked the info to them as well.

That guys has already been charged from what I understand. My further understanding is that the leaked information contained information that could easily identify intelligence sources in middle eastern countries. I don't think I need to go into what terrorists would do to those cooperating with America.

[killacs]

That guys has already been charged from what I understand. My further understanding is that the leaked information contained information that could easily identify intelligence sources in middle eastern countries. I don't think I need to go into what terrorists would do to those cooperating with America.

One of the guys the soldier I believe has been charged. Not sure on if any others have been charged or found.

[theanalogkid]

In so far as Obama is concerned I meant as to why we are still in Afghanistan. They are corrupt and we are spending an astronomical amount of money per week to stay there and the question is why? How does Obama justify remaining there?

The answer is simple if he leaves the next warmongering GOP candidate will be able to use it against him and then he won't get re-elected.

[killacs]

The answer is simple if he leaves the next warmongering GOP candidate will be able to use it against him and then he won't get re-elected.

If he leaves we don't control the opium trade.

[RicoVacilon]

This stuff required no security clearance to have access to. Can't really blame WikiLeaks for that. I hear they have stuff on the Russians and the Russians play by a different set of rules.

[sanantonio]

This stuff required no security clearance to have access to. Can't really blame WikiLeaks for that. I hear they have stuff on the Russians and the Russians play by a different set of rules.

Thats what I posted but you are the only one to concur on that so far.

[MonoxideChild]

There's almost nothing in this crap that is anything more than ****talking. Everything is basically someone calling someone else a name or saying they don't like so and so for whatever reason. This is all stuff I think you can just ask for and receive as well. I'm with Assange, root out lies and put them on blast.

[sanantonio]

Very interesting.

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?...4&jumival=5939